Publishing Ethics
The Journal of the Human Sciences (JHS) Statement of Publication Ethics and Malpractice is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (cope) which provides guidelines and codes of conduct for best practices of interest to journal editors.
The editorial board adopts the necessary procedures to deal with incorrect practices in the field of publishing, such as plagiarism, or unauthorized re-publishing as one of the binding responsibilities of the editorial board and maintains it to monitor all stages and procedures for scientific publishing in the journal.
The responsibility of the editor (publisher) for the provisions of publication.
Publication decision:
The editor is responsible for determining the priority of research submitted to the journal for publication, and evaluates manuscripts without taking into account the authors' race, gender, inclinations, religious beliefs, ethnic origins, citizenship or political philosophy. The judgment on the research paper is concluded in terms of the originality, clarity and legitimacy of the study and its importance to the scope of the journal. The editorial board is committed to observing copyright and quotation rights from previous scientific works in order to preserve the rights of others when publishing research in journals. The editor-in-chief is responsible for the decision to publish and print, based on the policy The magazine and compliance with the legal requirements for publication, especially with regard to defamation, slander, copyright infringement or piracy, and the editor-in-chief can consult members of the editorial board specialized in decision-making.
Confidentiality:-
The editorial board and editorial staff are obligated not to disclose any manuscript submitted for publication, to anyone other than the author or potential arbitrators and other editorial advisors and publisher as necessary.
Disclosure and conflict of interest:
The editorial board undertakes not to use the unpublished material that has been released in a research paper submitted by the editor or members of the editorial board for their own research purposes without observing the clear written consent of the author.
Responsibility of the reviewers (arbitrators).
It includes all the responsibilities of the editor-in-chief and members of the editorial board in making editorial decisions and assisting the author in revising the research paper.
Contribute to the decision to publish:
The arbitrator assists the editor-in-chief and the editorial board in making the publishing decision and assisting the author in improving and correcting the research.
Speed of service and adherence to the specified times:
The arbitrator must take the initiative and speed in evaluating the research directed to him at the specified times, and if this is not possible after conducting a preliminary review of the research, inform the editor-in-chief that the research is outside the scope of the arbitrator’s work, or the lack of time and the lack of sufficient capabilities for arbitration.
Confidentiality:-
All research information must be confidential to the arbitrator, and he should strive to preserve it and not disclose or discuss its content with any party except those authorized by the editorial board.
Objectivity:-
The arbitrator must prove the review and evaluation of the research directed to him with objective arguments and evidence, and to avoid arbitration on the basis of his personal point of view and personal, racial, sectarian, and other tastes.
Determine the sources:
The arbitrator shall document and characterize cases that do not mention similar published works related to the research paper, and should indicate whether observations or arguments derived from other publications are led by the relevant source, and the arbitrator shall inform the editorial board of any similarity or material overlap between the research paper and any other published paper. He has personal knowledge of it.
Conflict of interest:
The arbitrator shall be obligated not to arbitrate research for personal purposes, that is, to not accept arbitration for research through which there may be interests of persons or institutions, or in which personal relationships are observed.
Author's responsibility:
Preparation criteria:
The author must submit an original research and present it accurately and objectively in a consistent, scientific manner that matches the specifications of the refereed research, whether in terms of language, form or content, in accordance with the standards and policy of publication in the journal, and correctly indicate the data through full referral and taking into account the rights of others in the research, and avoiding showing topics Sensitive or immoral, tasteful, personal, ethnic, sectarian, false and incorrect information and translation of others' works without mentioning the source of the citation in the research.
Authenticity, plagiarism and recognition from sources:
The author must prove the originality of his work, and any quotation or use of paragraphs and words of others must be marginalized in an appropriate and correct manner. The magazine reserves the right to use plagiarism programs and discover piracy for works submitted for publication.
Repost:
The author cannot submit the same work (research) to more than one journal or conference, and doing so is considered unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Research authors:
The number of research authors should be limited to those contributors only in a large and clear way, both in terms of design and implementation, with the need to identify the author responsible for the research, who plays a major role in preparing and planning the research, while the rest of the authors are also mentioned in the research as actually contributing, and must The original author of the research must ensure that the names and information of all authors are present and that no other names for non-authors are included in the research. All authors must familiarize themselves with the research paper and agree explicitly on what is stated in its content and publish it in the form required in the journal publishing rules.
Referrals and references:
The author of the research is obliged to mention the referrals in an appropriate manner, and that the referral includes mentioning all books, publications, websites, and other research persons in the list of referrals and references quoted or referred to in the text of the research.
Reporting errors:
If the author becomes aware or discovers that there is a fundamental error and inaccuracy in the details of his research at any time, he must notify the editor-in-chief of the magazine or the publisher immediately, and cooperate to correct the error.
Data access and retention:
The author can be asked to provide raw data for a study, and it should be
